Re: Public httpd servers that support encryption

• To: Wolfgang Roeckelein <wolfgang@wi.whu-koblenz.de>
• Subject: Re: Public httpd servers that support encryption
• From: Damian Reeves <djr1003@cam.ac.uk>
• Date: Thu, 9 Nov 1995 03:47:46 +0000 (GMT)
• cc: Holger Reif <Holger.Reif@PrakInf.TU-Ilmenau.DE>, andrew@andy.alt.za, www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
• In-Reply-To: <9511081239.AA26692@sirius.wi.WHU-Koblenz.de>

On Wed, 8 Nov 1995, Wolfgang Roeckelein wrote:

> The new 2.0 beta 2 versions of the netscape navigator should accept  
> additional certificates and CAs, has anybody tested this already?
> At least you should now be able to build a inhouse combination of Navigator  
> and a SSL server which provide secure communication among them without getting  
> VeriSign involved.

The version for Linux crashes and burns as soon as you click on any of the
options in the security dialogue, what a marvellously stable beta release
this is.  Don't know if this behaviour is strongly simulated by the versions
for the other platforms, but then I wouldn't expect much more from the
company you love to hate...

Damian

• Re: Public httpd servers that support encryption
• From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>

• Re: Public httpd servers that support encryption
• From: Wolfgang Roeckelein <wolfgang@wi.whu-koblenz.de>

• Previous: I-D ACTION:draft-luotonen-ssl-tunneling-01.txt
• Next: mail port
• Index(es):
  • Index
  • Thread